You Can Go Straight To Hell!”: J.D. Vance Goes Nuclear on Radical Left psss
You Can Go Straight To Hell!”: J.D. Vance Goes Nuclear on Radical Left
Vice President JD Vance has issued a searing critique of California Governor Gavin Newsom, condemning his rhetoric that allegedly encourages violence against law enforcement.
The comments come after a recent wave of attacks on federal officers, including the Dallas ICE shooting that left shell casings marked “ANTI ICE.”
Hindustan Times reported that Vance said, “If your political rhetoric encourages violence against law enforcement, you can go straight to hell and you have no place in the political conversation.”
The Republican leader did not mince words, making clear that political posturing has real-life consequences.
Vance’s remarks were directed at Newsom and other Democratic leaders who have publicly criticized ICE and law enforcement in California.
Fox LA noted, “Vance criticized Newsom and other Democrats following the Dallas ICE facility shooting, blaming their rhetoric.”
For years, Democrats in California have taken a hardline stance against law enforcement while promoting sanctuary policies that protect criminals.
“Words matter,” Vance said. “When leaders demonize police and ICE officers, they are effectively giving permission to radicals to act.”
The Vice President’s statement reflects growing frustration among conservatives who see escalating violence as a direct result of political rhetoric.
Yahoo News reported that Vance’s message resonated with many Americans who have grown tired of the left blaming law enforcement for societal problems.
“There is no excuse for encouraging attacks on officers,” Vance added. “We must hold those in power accountable for the environment they create.”
Newsom’s critics argue that his progressive policies have created a culture of impunity for criminal behavior in California.
“The governor has repeatedly made statements that embolden radicals,” Vance said. “This has consequences, as we’ve seen.”
Vance’s comments came during a press briefing where he emphasized the importance of protecting law enforcement personnel.
Hindustan Times quoted Vance saying, “California’s leaders cannot continue to play politics while officers are targeted in the line of duty.”
The Vice President also warned that left-wing rhetoric often crosses the line into tacit endorsement of violence.
“When you publicly denounce those who enforce the law, you make them targets,” Vance said.
Conservative media outlets have widely shared Vance’s comments, praising his direct approach in confronting left-wing leaders.
“This is not about politics; this is about protecting the people who protect us,” Vance emphasized.
The Vice President also addressed recent protests in California, stating that they have too often turned violent and targeted law enforcement.
“Leaders must be responsible for the tone they set,” he said. “You cannot encourage riots and then feign innocence when things go too far.”
BOMBSHELL: CIA Director Ratcliffe Releases Newly Declassified Documents Revealing Joe Biden…
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has declassified a 2015 intelligence report revealing that then-Vice President Joe Biden requested the agency not to disseminate a document detailing Ukrainian officials’ concerns about his family’s alleged corrupt business dealings in Ukraine.
The report, dated December 2015 and created in 2016, captured Ukrainian officials’ frustration over Biden’s visit to Kyiv, where they expected discussions on personnel matters but received only a generic public speech.
Following the visit, some Ukrainian officials privately expressed concerns that the U.S. Vice President’s family had ties to corruption in Ukraine, viewing it as evidence of a double standard within the U.S. government regarding corruption and political power.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe declassified the heavily redacted records, stating that this was an example of “politicization of intelligence.” A senior CIA official confirmed that Biden’s request was granted, and the intelligence report was not disseminated outside the CIA.
The official noted that it was “extremely rare and unusual” for the White House to inquire about the dissemination of a particular report for what appeared to be political reasons.
The declassified documents have reignited scrutiny over Biden’s actions as Vice President and raised questions about the extent to which political considerations influenced intelligence operations during that period.
Republican lawmakers have seized upon the declassified documents, alleging that Biden’s aides suppressed information about his family’s business ties in Ukraine to protect his political interests.
James Comer, a Republican lawmaker, claimed that the newly declassified CIA documents back GOP allegations of suppression of Biden family business ties in Ukraine.
This revelation adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that intelligence agencies may have been used to shield the Biden family from scrutiny during the Obama administration.
The full implications of this declassified document remain to be seen, but it underscores the ongoing scrutiny of the Biden family’s foreign business dealings and the role of intelligence agencies in addressing potential conflicts of interest.
The declassification of this report has prompted calls for further investigation into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information.
Critics argue that the suppression of such information undermines public trust in government institutions and raises concerns about accountability and transparency.
The debate over the declassification of this report highlights the broader issue of executive power and the balance between transparency and oversight.
It raises important questions about the role of intelligence agencies in informing public discourse and the extent to which political considerations should influence the dissemination of sensitive information.
As the controversy continues to unfold, lawmakers and the public await further developments and potential investigations into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information related to Ukraine.
The declassification of this report serves as a reminder of the complex and often contentious relationship between politics and intelligence, and the challenges inherent in ensuring that sensitive information is handled appropriately and in the public interest.
In the coming weeks, it is expected that congressional committees will hold hearings to examine the circumstances surrounding the suppression of this intelligence report and to assess the implications for U.S. foreign policy and national security.
The outcome of these investigations could have significant ramifications for the Biden administration and its legacy, as well as for public trust in government institutions and the integrity of the intelligence community.
As the story develops, it will be important to monitor the responses of key stakeholders, including lawmakers and intelligence officials, to gauge the broader impact of this declassification on U.S. politics and governance.
The declassification of this report also underscores the importance of oversight and accountability in the intelligence community, and the need for mechanisms to ensure that sensitive information is handled responsibly and in accordance with the law.
Moving forward, it will be crucial to assess the lessons learned from this episode and to consider reforms that can strengthen the integrity and transparency of intelligence operations.
This declassification brings to light the urgent need for reform in how intelligence is protected from political interference.
Lawmakers are expected to demand greater transparency and safeguards to prevent future suppression of critical intelligence for political purposes.
The revelations further confirm concerns about the politicization of intelligence agencies during the Obama-Biden era.
Republicans and conservative commentators argue that this episode demonstrates a clear abuse of executive authority to shield political allies.
The CIA documents highlight how the suppression of intelligence can undermine national security and the credibility of U.S. foreign policy.
The declassified report has reinvigorated calls for accountability and thorough investigations into the Biden family’s dealings abroad.
35.FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino Warns of Broader Network in Charlie Kirk Assassination
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino has confirmed that the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk is being treated as an ideologically motivated attack, with investigators probing whether the alleged assassin acted alone or as part of a broader network.
Speaking on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom,” Bongino stated, “If this was a larger effort, if there was any aiding and abetting… we’re looking into that.”
He emphasized that the FBI is committed to leaving “no stone unturned” in its investigation, underscoring the seriousness with which the agency is approaching the case.
Bongino revealed that the suspect had been “taken over” by leftist ideology leading up to the shooting, indicating a potential radicalization process.
The Deputy Director noted that the suspect had become increasingly withdrawn and politically active before the attack, raising concerns about the influence of extremist ideologies.
Investigators are examining the suspect’s online activity and affiliations with left-wing groups to determine if there were any coordinated efforts behind the assassination.
Bongino confirmed that the FBI is reviewing video footage showing the gunman leaping from a rooftop after the fatal shot, which has been critical in advancing the investigation.
He highlighted that the forensic evidence gathered from the scene has provided significant leads, aiding in the identification and apprehension of the suspect.
The Deputy Director stated that the FBI is also looking into any financial transactions or communications that may indicate support or planning from external sources.
Bongino condemned the act as an attack on free speech and political discourse, emphasizing the importance of protecting conservative voices in the public sphere.
He called for unity among Americans in denouncing political violence, regardless of ideological affiliation, to preserve the integrity of democratic institutions.
The Deputy Director acknowledged the emotional impact of the assassination on the conservative community but urged restraint and due process in the ongoing investigation.
Bongino reiterated the FBI’s commitment to transparency and accountability, assuring the public that all leads are being thoroughly investigated.
He expressed confidence that the agency would uncover the full scope of the plot and bring those responsible to justice.
The Deputy Director noted that the investigation is ongoing and that further updates will be provided as new information becomes available.
Bongino emphasized the need for vigilance and awareness among the public to prevent similar incidents in the future.
He urged individuals to report any suspicious activity or information that could aid in the investigation.
The Deputy Director highlighted the role of community cooperation in combating extremism and ensuring public safety.
Bongino acknowledged the challenges posed by online radicalization but reaffirmed the FBI’s dedication to addressing these threats.
He called for a balanced approach that respects civil liberties while effectively countering extremist ideologies.
The Deputy Director commended the efforts of law enforcement agencies at all levels in responding to the assassination and supporting the investigation.
Bongino expressed gratitude for the assistance of federal, state, and local partners in gathering intelligence and resources.
He noted that the collaboration between agencies has been instrumental in advancing the investigation and ensuring a comprehensive response.
BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..
It’s finally happening.
John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.
Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.
Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.
Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.
Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.
Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.
CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”
“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”
Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.
James Comey, for his part, did the same.
The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.
The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.
These two didn’t just make bad calls. They rigged the process.
Even worse, Brennan later told Congress under oath that the Steele dossier “wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence” used in the Russia assessment.
But a newly surfaced email shows that he pushed the dossier hard, despite being warned it could destroy the report’s credibility.
And why did they push it so aggressively? Because it wasn’t about national security.
It was about kneecapping President Trump before he was even sworn in.
“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told the press.
“They all knew what they were doing.”
Millions of tax dollars were wasted. Reputations were destroyed.
“Jasmine Crockett should visit a Trump rally before shooting her mouth off,” Leavitt challenged.
“She’ll meet grandmothers, veterans, farmers, teachers, truckers—all proud Americans who just want their country back. These are the people she called mentally ill. What an absolute disgrace.”
And for what? To push Hillary Clinton’s opposition research as gospel truth.
Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt.
Fusion hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele. Steele gave them fiction.
Senator Josh Hawley demanded action: “If Brennan and Comey lied to Congress or weaponized their agencies against a political opponent, they should be prosecuted—no exceptions, no excuses.”
This scandal is bigger than Watergate.
It poisoned public trust, warped the 2016 election aftermath, and set the tone for years of baseless attacks on a sitting president.
The investigations are underway.
Now the question is, will the justice system do its job, or will the same people who buried the truth for years bury it again?
Brennan and Comey must be held accountable.
No one is above the law, not even the architects of one of the most dishonest political smear campaigns in American history.
Battle To Replace McConnell Heats Up After Unexpected Snag psss
Battle To Replace McConnell Heats Up After Unexpected Snag
Through his leadership PAC, Barr contributed multiple times to lawmakers including Reps. Anthony Gonzalez, John Katko, David Valadao, and Jaime Herrera Beutler—all of whom broke with Trump after the January 6 Capitol riot. A Trump adviser called Barr’s support “a slap in the face,” and others have labeled him a McConnell protégé unlikely to stand with Trump in tough moments.
Barr is competing against former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron and businessman Nate Morris. Cameron lost the 2023 governor’s race despite Trump’s endorsement, while Morris has come under fire for donating to Nikki Haley shortly before she challenged Trump in the 2024 GOP primary.
Barr’s team argues he remains a strong Trump ally and that his PAC has made hundreds of donations aimed at building GOP unity. His spokesman highlighted Trump’s past support for Barr and pointed to Morris’ backing of Haley and his business record as reasons to question Morris’s commitment to conservative principles.With Trump maintaining broad influence in Kentucky—where he won by over 30 points—his endorsement could be decisive in the 2026 Senate primary, shaping the future of GOP leadership in the state and beyond.
Looking at him lying silently in the hospital bed, my heart felt like it was tightening. I stayed awake whenever I was by his side, afraid that if I closed my eyes, I might miss something,” Kyra Phillips shared about John Roberts’ time in the hospital bed. She also spoke about her worries as he has grown older, and about the time he suffered a seizure — when he uttered a single word that sent chills down her spine
For years, Fox News anchor John Roberts has been a familiar face to millions of viewers. Calm, steady, and commanding on screen, he has covered everything from political showdowns to breaking global crises. But behind the cameras, away from the studio lights, Roberts has faced battles that few outside his closest circle truly understand.
His partner, journalist Kyra Phillips, recently opened up about one of the most harrowing chapters of their lives together: Roberts’ time in the hospital.
“Looking at him lying silently in the hospital bed, my heart felt like it was tightening,” Phillips recalled. “I stayed awake whenever I was by his side, afraid that if I closed my eyes, I might miss something.”
For Phillips, the memory remains vivid—the sterile smell of antiseptic, the soft hum of machines, the steady but fragile rhythm of Roberts’ breathing. Even though doctors reassured her that he was stable, she could not shake the feeling of vulnerability. The man she had always known as strong and unshakable suddenly seemed fragile, human, and painfully mortal.
Her fears deepened as Roberts grew older. Health concerns that once felt distant now loomed larger. Phillips spoke candidly about her constant worry for his well-being, confessing that every unexpected call or sudden silence made her heart race. “When you love someone, you learn to live with a certain amount of fear,” she admitted. “But that doesn’t make it easier.”
The most terrifying moment came during an incident that neither of them will ever forget. Roberts suffered a seizure—an episode that left Phillips shaken to her core. She described the sheer helplessness of watching someone you love collapse, powerless to stop it. In the chaos of that moment, however, there was one detail that haunted her most.
“When he came to, he uttered a single word,” Phillips said, her voice trembling as she recounted it. “It was just one word, but it was enough to send chills down my spine. It was like a window into his fear, or maybe into something deeper that he couldn’t fully express.
Phillips did not disclose exactly what Roberts said, but her expression alone conveyed how profoundly it shook her. That single word, in her mind, carried the weight of vulnerability, mortality, and the fragility of life.
For a couple accustomed to public life, these private struggles have served as a reminder of what truly matters. Behind the headlines, behind the broadcasts, they are simply two people navigating the unpredictability of health, love, and aging together.
