The Judge Was Just Announced in James Comey’s Case – This Is UNBELIEVABLE pssss
The Judge Was Just Announced in James Comey’s Case – This Is UNBELIEVABLE
The Judge Was Just Announced in James Comey’s Case
The criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey, one of Donald Trump’s most prominent adversaries, will be handled by the newest judge on the federal bench in Alexandria, Virginia.
Court records show that U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, a Biden appointee confirmed in 2021, was randomly assigned Thursday to oversee the matter after a grand jury indicted Comey on charges of lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding.
Comey’s indictment represents the culmination of years of conflict with Trump, who has frequently accused the former FBI director of abusing his office during the 2016 election and early stages of the Russia investigation.
Comey has said publicly since the indictment, “I’m not afraid” and insisted he is innocent.
He is scheduled to be arraigned on Oct. 9 in Alexandria.
Nachmanoff, 57, has a long history in federal courts in northern Virginia. Before his appointment to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, he spent six years as a magistrate judge and more than a decade as a public defender.
He was recommended for the federal bench by Virginia’s two Democratic senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, and confirmed by a narrow 52-46 Senate vote, with only three Republicans—Lindsey Graham, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski—supporting his nomination.
As a magistrate judge in 2019, Nachmanoff presided over the arraignment of Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, two associates of Rudy Giuliani who faced campaign finance charges connected to Giuliani’s efforts to dig up damaging information about Joe Biden in Ukraine. He released both men on $1 million bond.
His career before joining the judiciary reflected a commitment to defense work in some of the country’s most high-profile cases.
As a federal public defender, Nachmanoff’s office represented al-Qaeda operative Zacarias Moussaoui and Somali pirates captured after attacking a Navy vessel in 2010. In one notable case argued before the Supreme Court, Nachmanoff successfully pressed for judicial discretion in sentencing drug defendants whose punishments were inflated by crack cocaine laws.
The justices ruled 7-2 in favor of his position, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writing the majority opinion.
His background as a defense attorney has drawn attention now that he will oversee proceedings against a former FBI director facing felony charges.
Critics note that Nachmanoff’s past career representing controversial defendants could influence his judicial approach, while supporters argue that it shows a long-standing respect for due process and civil liberties.
Comey, who led the FBI from 2013 until his dismissal by Trump in 2017, has defended the bureau’s handling of investigations into Hillary Clinton’s emails during the 2016 campaign, but also authorized surveillance that Republicans later denounced as politically motivated.
After his firing, he became an outspoken Trump critic, drawing condemnation from conservatives who accused him of politicizing federal law enforcement. Trump has openly said he views Comey as part of a “deep state” effort to undermine his presidency.
The indictment charges that Comey misled Congress in sworn testimony and attempted to obstruct an inquiry into the FBI’s conduct.
He will be represented at trial by Patrick Fitzgerald, a former federal prosecutor known for his work in the Valerie Plame leak investigation and the prosecution of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. The Justice Department team pursuing the case is led by U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, recently elevated to the post and now heading one of the most politically sensitive prosecutions of the Trump era.
With Nachmanoff on the bench, the Comey case will unfold before a judge whose career has spanned both defense and prosecution, and whose decisions could shape the legal boundaries of executive power and accountability.
Whistleblower Describes Maxwell In Prison, Reveals Nothing on Trump
Ghislaine Maxwell received preferential treatment while incarcerated at a federal prison in Texas, according to a former nurse at the facility. Noella Turnage, who has worked for the Bureau of Prisons since 2019, identified herself Monday as the whistleblower who previously provided some of Maxwell’s correspondence to members of the House Judiciary Committee, Newsweek reported.
“I actually emailed them from work, from my Bureau of Prisons email address, and said, ‘Hey, this is who I am, this is where I work, and I have some things I think you might be interested in, and documents you may be interested in,’” Turnage told KBTX. “I didn’t even specify what it was.”
A staff member for Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, responded to Turnage within 30 minutes, she said. The 46-year-old added that she has since participated in multiple follow-up calls regarding her disclosures.
“I have not shared them with anyone other than the committee,” Turnage said of Maxwell’s emails, some of which she showed to a reporter this week, KBTX reported.
Over the summer, Maxwell confirmed to the Department of Justice during a series of sit-down meetings that she did not witness Donald Trump exhibit inappropriate behavior on the occasions that she met him.
Maxwell had met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for a total of nine hours late last month. According to her attorney, she had been forthright during questioning and did not “plead the fifth.”
According to ABC News’ sources, Maxwell reportedly said that Trump had “never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern.”
As for Turnage, she said she provided Maxwell’s correspondence after facing retaliation from Bureau of Prisons officials for reporting what she described as poor working conditions and the alleged mistreatment of inmates at Federal Prison Camp Bryan.
She said her complaints resulted in her reassignment to the facility’s “phone room,” where her responsibilities included monitoring inmate telephone calls and emails, Newsweek noted.
“They call it prison jail,” Turnage told KBTX. “I would be looking for any evidence that they’re doing something they shouldn’t be. Like, are they trying to smuggle in drugs? Are they doing this? Are they whatever? But these women aren’t risking that, not for the most part. And same as emails, you’re monitoring for anything they shouldn’t be doing. Usually on the phone, the biggest thing you run into is they’ll call a family member who then conference calls somebody else that they’re not supposed to be talking to.”
Turnage said that Tanisha Hall, the warden of the federal prison, personally handled all incoming mail addressed to Maxwell.
Maxwell — who is serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s international sex-trafficking operation — also received “private, catered-style visitation arrangements” at the minimum-security facility, according to KBTX.
“There was the whole thing about closing down the compound for her to have a visit,” Turnage told the outlet.
Maxwell’s relatives were permitted to attend private meetings, often disguised as legal consultations, claims Turnage.
“I guess maybe they can bring everybody and say it’s a legal visit?” she continued. “I don’t know, but they’re going to have an area cornered off for you, so it won’t be a problem coming in. They’re going to provide drinks, coffee, snacks, and all this stuff.”
Some of Ghislaine Maxwell’s outgoing correspondence appeared “coded,” with irregular spacing and formatting that differed from messages sent by other inmates, according to Turnage.
The veteran Bureau of Prisons (BOP) employee printed some of Maxwell’s messages and examined them at home. After noticing a Wall Street Journal report in early October about the favorable treatment that Epstein’s former associate allegedly received at the federal prison, Turnage shared the emails with Raskin’s office.
The Odd Scent Guided Him to the Wall — What He Found Behind It Was Unbelievable psss
The Odd Scent Guided Him to the Wall — What He Found Behind It Was Unbelievable
It started as an ordinary, quiet evening, the kind where nothing seems out of the ordinary. A man noticed a faint, unpleasant odor lingering in the air of his home. At first, he dismissed it, assuming it might be spoiled food left in the kitchen or a plumbing issue somewhere in the house. He cleaned the surfaces, checked the trash, and inspected the drains, yet the smell refused to disappear. Over the next few days, it grew stronger and more persistent. No matter how much he ventilated the rooms or scrubbed every corner, the scent seemed to follow him, clinging to the walls and corners of the home. Sleep became more difficult, and the once comfortable environment began to feel heavy, almost suffocating.
Slowly, unease crept in, and he began to suspect that something hidden within the walls might be the source of the odor. Following his intuition, he decided to investigate further. He moved through the rooms, holding his breath at times, trying to locate the strongest point of the smell. After careful inspection, he identified a particular section of the wall where the scent seemed concentrated. With a mixture of caution and curiosity, he made a small opening in the drywall. What he discovered inside was shocking, though not in the way he had imagined. The cavity contained the remains of small animals—creatures that had somehow become trapped within the walls and perished quietly over time.
The sight was not frightening, but it carried a profound sadness. These small lives had gone unnoticed, and their suffering had continued in silence, hidden from the world. The man felt a mixture of emotions—shock, sorrow, and reflection. He realized how easy it is for problems to grow unnoticed, quietly escalating until they become impossible to ignore. The discovery became more than just a home repair issue; it became a lesson in attention and care, a reminder that even subtle warnings can point to larger truths.
He called in professionals to safely remove the remains and sanitize the area. Neighbors, hearing about the incident, offered advice and support, amazed at the unusual but relatable story. Experts in pest control and home restoration explained that while such occurrences were rare, they were not impossible, and they emphasized the importance of regular maintenance and vigilance. The cleanup was meticulous, taking several days to ensure that the home was restored to a safe and healthy condition.
News of the incident spread beyond the neighborhood. Locally shared online, the story resonated with thousands of people who began sharing similar experiences or expressing their shock and empathy. What started as a small domestic mystery transformed into a broader conversation about observation, care, and the unnoticed details in our lives. Social media posts and online forums were filled with readers recounting their own encounters with hidden problems, from pests to plumbing disasters, all of which might have been prevented if only early signs had been acknowledged.
Once the walls were repaired and the home restored, the man felt a profound sense of relief. His living space was fresh and clean once more, and the heavy, unsettling feeling that had lingered in the air was gone. Yet, the experience left a lasting impact on him far beyond the physical repair. He reflected deeply on the importance of listening—to the environment around him, to small disturbances, and even to the subtle signs that life sends. He understood that the faintest warning signs, if ignored, can grow into larger, more difficult problems.
From that day forward, he chose to be more attentive, not only in maintaining his home but also in noticing the small things in daily life that often go unseen. He realized that quiet messages—whether in the hum of a house, the behavior of a pet, or the emotions of people around him—often precede louder, more urgent warnings. Life, he discovered, communicates in subtle ways, and learning to observe and respond early can prevent unnecessary suffering.
The incident also inspired him to share his story with friends, family, and online communities, hoping others could learn from his experience. Many readers expressed gratitude, noting that it reminded them to pay attention to the small signs in their own homes and lives. The story became a quiet but powerful reminder of mindfulness, responsibility, and care—not just for a home, but for the life lived within it.
Even years later, the memory of the discovery remained vivid in his mind. He would occasionally pause and recall the moment when the faint scent had first caught his attention, understanding that it had been more than just a smell—it had been a message. A message to slow down, look closer, and address what could no longer be ignored. The lesson stayed with him: that vigilance, awareness, and responsiveness are essential not only for the well-being of a home but for the life one leads. Through this experience, he learned that attention to small details could prevent larger tragedies and that even quiet, hidden things deserve recognition before they grow into something irreversible.
